![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
winter_elfVery disjointed. It's like the script was written by committee with no overall vision tying it together. And we're not talking film editing - that was fine - but rather the movie itself couldn't decide if it was serious or humorous or what. It was not bad but just lacked a certain.. I don't know. We kind of walked out and it wasn't bad it just wasn't ... all there.
Tonto was fine. The Lone Ranger was a little wallpaper-ish himself. He couldn't carry the movie, but that's okay, his horse could. Also the side characters were a little more interesting and vivid - almost distracting from TLR.
What I liked: Silver (the spirit horses who liked to be on high places was a scream). Tonto & horse arguments, big action pieces
What I disliked: the wannabe love between The Lone Ranger and his brothers widow (no. yuck). the violent Indian death/attack - that really did not serve the story AT ALL, the narration 'future' bits that broke the story.
My suggestion - rent it with a group of friends and have a grand time talking about how to improve it.
Rating - 3.5 stars
Tonto was fine. The Lone Ranger was a little wallpaper-ish himself. He couldn't carry the movie, but that's okay, his horse could. Also the side characters were a little more interesting and vivid - almost distracting from TLR.
What I liked: Silver (the spirit horses who liked to be on high places was a scream). Tonto & horse arguments, big action pieces
What I disliked: the wannabe love between The Lone Ranger and his brothers widow (no. yuck). the violent Indian death/attack - that really did not serve the story AT ALL, the narration 'future' bits that broke the story.
My suggestion - rent it with a group of friends and have a grand time talking about how to improve it.
Rating - 3.5 stars
