![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
-sounds better than Sturgeon Moon?

my wimpy picture. I watched the Eclipse from 2:30am till 3:00am. I took a few pics right when I first went outside, then didn't try again later - which I should have. No good telephoto, but a decent night setting. I don't know if it would have picked up the deep reddish color of the eclipsed moon or if there was not enough light. Kind of bummed I didn't catch any stars with the moon.
Anyway, the moon was in a nice high position in the sky, it was clear as a bell and even slightly cool, with the porch rails being damp, and it even seemed dark and silent. Wow. Wish I could have been out in the desert. With no light pollution, I bet it was fantastic!

my wimpy picture. I watched the Eclipse from 2:30am till 3:00am. I took a few pics right when I first went outside, then didn't try again later - which I should have. No good telephoto, but a decent night setting. I don't know if it would have picked up the deep reddish color of the eclipsed moon or if there was not enough light. Kind of bummed I didn't catch any stars with the moon.
Anyway, the moon was in a nice high position in the sky, it was clear as a bell and even slightly cool, with the porch rails being damp, and it even seemed dark and silent. Wow. Wish I could have been out in the desert. With no light pollution, I bet it was fantastic!
no subject
Date: 29 Aug 2007 06:49 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Aug 2007 08:04 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Aug 2007 09:18 (UTC)My feeling is that it's good to have good equipment and knowledge, but it's the continual act of taking photos and evaluating what works for you and what doesn't that makes one better.
no subject
Date: 29 Aug 2007 23:45 (UTC)I think it's pretty good, too. It got the partial shadow, after all.
(Heheh--I tried with my celphone and just got a little pixel-dot!!!)